State v. Hollowell

521 P.2d 15, 17 Or. App. 220, 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 1053
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 15, 1974
DocketNo. 73-1268-C
StatusPublished

This text of 521 P.2d 15 (State v. Hollowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hollowell, 521 P.2d 15, 17 Or. App. 220, 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 1053 (Or. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s giving of two instructions to the jury, contending that there was no evidence to support them. He does not dispute their accuracy. One of the instructions, which related to the lawfulness of defense of property by the victim, was based on ORS 161.229. The other instruc[221]*221tion, regarding out-of-court statements made by defendant, was Oregon State Bar Uniform Jury Instruction No. 204.01, which is based on ORS 17.250 (4). Our review of the record reveals that there is some evidence to support the giving of both instructions.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 161.229
Oregon § 161.229
§ 17.250
Oregon § 17.250

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 P.2d 15, 17 Or. App. 220, 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hollowell-orctapp-1974.