State v. Holloway

857 N.E.2d 141, 111 Ohio St. 3d 496
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 6, 2006·No. No. 2006-1331·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Watkins v. Collins, 111 Ohio St.3d 425, 2006-Ohio-5082, 857 N.E.2d 78.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Pamela Bolton, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Paul Mancino Jr., for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Holloway, 857 N.E.2d 141, 111 Ohio St. 3d 496 (Ohio 2006).

857 N.E.2d 141 (State v. Holloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Boswell, 88292 (10-25-2007)
2007 Ohio 5718 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State v. Fuller, Unpublished Decision (3-9-2007)
2007 Ohio 1020 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State v. Holloway
862 N.E.2d 120 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Imburgia, Unpublished Decision (2-1-2007)
2007 Ohio 390 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)