State v. Hollins

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Hollins

205 N.W.2d 329, 295 Minn. 583, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1358

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 16, 1973

DocketNo. 43390

StatusPublished

This text of 205 N.W.2d 329 (State v. Hollins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hollins, 205 N.W.2d 329, 295 Minn. 583, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1358 (Mich. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant, who along with two codefendants was convicted by a district court jury of aggravated robbery, Minn. St. 609.245, contends on this appeal from judgment of conviction that (1) there was insufficient evidence as a matter of law to support the verdict and (2) there were numerous errors occurring during the proceedings that deprived him of due process of law. We have carefully considered each contention and find each of them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant, who along with two codefendants was convicted by a district court jury of aggravated robbery, Minn. St. 609.245, contends on this appeal from judgment of conviction that (1) there was insufficient evidence as a matter of law to support the verdict and (2) there were numerous errors occurring during the proceedings that deprived him of due process of law. We have carefully considered each contention and find each of them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 N.W.2d 329, 295 Minn. 583, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hollins-minn-1973.