State v. Hollingsworth
This text of State v. Hollingsworth (State v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) ID Nos. 2207003848 ) 2210009751 TRACION D. HOLLINGSWORTH, ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER
1. On this 14th day of March, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Tracion
D. Hollingsworth’s (“Defendant”) pro se Motion for Sentence Modification (the
“Motion”) made pursuant to Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b),1 the
sentence imposed upon Defendant, and the record in this case, it appears to the Court
that:
2. On September 12, 2022, Defendant pled guilty to Carrying a Concealed
Deadly Weapon (“CCDW”) (Class G Non-Violent Felony) and Assault in the Third
Degree (Class A Misdemeanor).2 On October 3, 2022, the Court sentenced her to
(1) CCDW, two years of Level V supervision, suspended for one year of Level III
1 D.I.s 2207003848-24, 2210009751-14. Defendant filed the Motion in the form of a letter. The Court interprets the contents of that letter as a motion for sentence modification. Defendant does not specifically cite to Rule 35(b) in the Motion, but she asks this Court to modify the Level IV supervision part of her sentence. 2 D.I. 2207003848-5. supervision; and (2) Assault in the Third Degree, one year of Level V supervision,
suspended for one year of Level III supervision.3
3. On November 1, 2022, the Delaware Department of Correction (“DOC”)
stated that Defendant had violated probation by allegedly committing criminal
offenses during her probationary period, including Theft, Resisting Arrest, Assault
in the Third Degree, Shoplifting, Criminal Mischief, Disorderly Conduct, and
Criminal Trespass.4 On February 28, 2023, Defendant pled guilty to Resisting Arrest
(Class G Violent Felony). On March 8, 2023, the Court sentenced her to (1) CCDW,
one year and eleven months of Level V supervision, suspended for one year and six
months of Level III supervision; (2) Assault in the Third Degree, one year of Level
V supervision, suspended for one year and six months of Level III supervision; and
(3) Resisting, two years of Level V supervision, suspended for one year and six
months of Level III supervision.5
4. On April 5, 2023, the DOC stated that Defendant had violated probation
by failing to report to her probation officer, testing positive for nonprescribed
controlled substances on March 14, 2023, March 22, 2023, and March 27, 2023,
failing to comply with the substance abuse and mental health treatment conditions
3 D.I. 2207003848-7. 4 D.I. 2207003848-11. 5 D.I.s 2207003848-13, 2210009751-8.
2 of her sentence, and failing to comply with curfew on March 20, 2023. 6 On April
12, 2023, the Court sentenced her to (1) CCDW, one year and eleven months of
Level V supervision, suspended for successful completion of Level IV substance
abuse treatment, followed by one year of Level III intensive outpatient treatment;
(2) Assault in the Third Degree, probation continued at Level III or as previously
imposed; and (3) Resisting, probation continued at Level III or as previously
imposed.7
5. On July 6, 2023, the DOC stated that Defendant had violated probation by
threatening police officers, a nurse, and other offenders in the Road to Recovery
program and repeatedly violating program rules. On July 20, 2023, the Court
sentenced her to one year and eleven months of Level V supervision, suspended for
successful completion of Level IV inpatient drug treatment, followed by one year of
Level III aftercare treatment.8
6. On November 25, 2023, Defendant filed the instant Motion, in which she
asks the Court to reduce or eliminate the duration of the Level IV portion of her
sentence. Defendant requests to be released to Level III supervision, either through
6 D.I.s 2207003848-17, 2210009751-12. 7 D.I.s 2207003848-18, 2210009751-13. 8 D.I.s 2207003848-23.
3 a grant of credit time or a reduction of her sentence. She expresses her wish to return
home to spend time with her family.9
7. Rule 35(b) authorizes this Court to “reduce the fine or term or conditions
of partial confinement or probation, at any time.” A motion to modify the terms of
partial confinement or probation is not subject to the ninety-day limitation that
applies to a motion for sentence reduction.10
8. Given Defendant’s history of illegal drug use, Level IV inpatient drug
treatment is a proper part of her sentence. Defendant’s sentence is appropriate for
all the reasons stated at the time of sentencing. No information has been provided
to the Court that would warrant a modification of the sentence. Hence, Defendant’s
Motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________________ Sheldon K. Rennie, Judge
Original to Prothonotary
cc: Tracion D. Hollingsworth (SBI #00462675)
9 D.I.s 2207003848-24, 2210009751-14. 10 State v. Harmon, 2023 WL 7599111, at *1 (Del. Super. Nov. 14, 2023) (quoting State v. Bailey, 2017 WL 8787504, at *1 (Del. Super. Oct. 3, 2017)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Hollingsworth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hollingsworth-delsuperct-2024.