State v. Holle

48 A. 1118, 64 N.J.L. 363, 35 Vroom 363, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 5, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 48 A. 1118 (State v. Holle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Holle, 48 A. 1118, 64 N.J.L. 363, 35 Vroom 363, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 125 (N.J. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court- is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance—Depue, Van Syckel, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Bogert, Nixon, - Hendrickson,. Adams, Vredenburgh. 10. ...

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A. 1118, 64 N.J.L. 363, 35 Vroom 363, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-holle-nj-1900.