State v. Holle
48 A. 1118, 64 N.J.L. 363, 35 Vroom 363, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 125
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court- is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—Depue, Van Syckel, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Bogert, Nixon, - Hendrickson,. Adams, Vredenburgh. 10. ...
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Holle, 48 A. 1118, 64 N.J.L. 363, 35 Vroom 363, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 125 (N.J. 1900).
48 A. 1118 (State v. Holle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.