Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Holland

State v. Holland

578 S.E.2d 316, 356 N.C. 685
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 27, 2003
Docket354P02
StatusPublished

This text of 578 S.E.2d 316 (State v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Holland, 578 S.E.2d 316, 356 N.C. 685 (N.C. 2003).

Opinion

578 S.E.2d 316 (2003)
356 N.C. 685

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Robert Lawrence HOLLAND.

No. 354P02.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 27, 2003.

John H. Painter, Monroe, for Holland.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, Patricia A. Duffy, for State.

Prior report: 150 N.C.App. 457, 566 S.E.2d 90.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of February 2003."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Holland
566 S.E.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
State v. Hornsby
578 S.E.2d 316 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 S.E.2d 316, 356 N.C. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-holland-nc-2003.