State v. Holdren

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Holdren

180 A.3d 698, 232 N.J. 370

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 28, 2018

DocketC–623 September Term 2017; 080021

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 A.3d 698 (State v. Holdren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Holdren, 180 A.3d 698, 232 N.J. 370 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-5071-13 and A-1056-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issue of defendant's argument challenging his consecutive sentence because the sentencing court failed to comply with State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627, 498 A.2d 1239 (1985). The matter is remanded to the trial court for a statement of reasons as required by Yarbough. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-5071-13 and A-1056-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issue of defendant's argument challenging his consecutive sentence because the sentencing court failed to comply with State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627, 498 A.2d 1239 (1985). The matter is remanded to the trial court for a statement of reasons as required by Yarbough. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 A.3d 698, 232 N.J. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-holdren-nj-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack