State v. Holderness

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2014·No. 2D13-3704·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D12-3704 )

DAVID HOLDERNESS, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed July 18, 2014.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lisa D. Campbell, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Wade M. Whidden of Whidden Law P.L., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the trial court's order granting David Holderness'

motion to suppress evidence and statements. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court's order pursuant to our decision in State v.

Mitchell, 124 So. 3d 1046 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (holding that defendants lack standing to seek suppression relating to jurisdictional defects of coconspirator's arrest where they had no legally cognizable privacy interest in fraudulent prescriptions and evidence developed therefrom), and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Holderness, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

State v. Holderness (State v. Holderness) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mitchell
124 So. 3d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)