State v. Holderness

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Holderness

141 So. 3d 1278, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11020, 2014 WL 3543910

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 2014

DocketNo. 2D12-3704

StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 3d 1278 (State v. Holderness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Holderness, 141 So. 3d 1278, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11020, 2014 WL 3543910 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the trial court’s order granting David Holderness’ motion to suppress evidence and statements. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court’s order pursuant to our decision in State v. Mitchell, 124 So.3d 1046 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (holding that defendants lack standing to seek suppression relating to jurisdictional defects of coconspirator’s arrest where they had no legally cognizable privacy interest in fraudulent prescriptions and evidence developed therefrom), and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the trial court’s order granting David Holderness’ motion to suppress evidence and statements. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court’s order pursuant to our decision in State v. Mitchell, 124 So.3d 1046 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (holding that defendants lack standing to seek suppression relating to jurisdictional defects of coconspirator’s arrest where they had no legally cognizable privacy interest in fraudulent prescriptions and evidence developed therefrom), and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 So. 3d 1278, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11020, 2014 WL 3543910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-holderness-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack