Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Holder

State v. Holder

113 S.E.2d 15, 252 N.C. 121, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 394
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 2, 1960
Docket145
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 113 S.E.2d 15 (State v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Holder, 113 S.E.2d 15, 252 N.C. 121, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 394 (N.C. 1960).

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The defendant asked for a new trial solely upon the ground that the court committed error in recapitulating the defendant’s evidence and contentions and that he was prejudiced by the reference to the treatment of alcoholism.

Inadvertence in stating the contentions or in recapitulating the evidence must be called to the attention of the court in time for correction. After verdict the objection' comes too late. State v. Adams, 245 N.C. 344, 95 S.E. 2d 902.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pagano
242 S.E.2d 825 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. Hunt
222 S.E.2d 234 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)
State v. McAllister
214 S.E.2d 75 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. Black
196 S.E.2d 225 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1973)
State v. Virgil
172 S.E.2d 28 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1970)
State v. Goines
160 S.E.2d 469 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Cornelius
144 S.E.2d 203 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
State v. Case
116 S.E.2d 429 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E.2d 15, 252 N.C. 121, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-holder-nc-1960.