State v. Holcombe

41 La. Ann. 1066
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 15, 1889·No. No. 10,471·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

The defendant was prosecuted for murder, tried, convicted and sentenced to death.

He has appealed from the verdict and judgment.

The record is perfectly barren of any motion to quash, bill of excejition, motion in arrest or assignment of error and shows that all the essential forms required by law, in such cases, have been observed.

There is, however, amotion for a new trial; hut it states no matter which this court can review.

If it he true, that the district judge ruled incorrectly on certain points, which it is claimed he has, counsel ought to have objected at the time, in the mode pointed out by law.

In this qourt not even a manuscript brief has been filed in support of the appeal.

Complaining of a verdict and sentence, under such circumstances, is almost trifling with the court, besides inflicting, unnecessarily, heavy costs on the parish. State vs. Adams, 40 Ann. 213.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment herein he affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Holcombe, 41 La. Ann. 1066 (La. 1889).

41 La. Ann. 1066 (State v. Holcombe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brent
184 So. 2d 14 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1966)
Price v. Territory
1909 OK CR 8 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1909)
State v. Hauser
36 So. 396 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)
State v. Wright
104 La. 44 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1900)