State v. Hogg

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hogg

214 S.W.3d 350, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 226, 2007 WL 446946

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2007

DocketNo. ED 87964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 S.W.3d 350 (State v. Hogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hogg, 214 S.W.3d 350, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 226, 2007 WL 446946 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Dominic Hogg, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of statutory rape in the second degree, in violation of Section 566.034 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a persistent offender and sentenced him to twelve years imprisonment, to be served consecutively to sentences imposed in two other cases.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI