State v. Hogan

775 So. 2d 288, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1038, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2170, 2000 WL 1676001
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 9, 2000·No. No. SC96588·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted for review the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Hogan v. State, 753 So.2d 570 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), based on certified conflict with the First District Court of Appeal’s decisions in McDonald v. State, 578 So.2d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), and Highsmith v. State, 580 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hogan, 775 So. 2d 288, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1038, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2170, 2000 WL 1676001 (Fla. 2000).

775 So. 2d 288 (State v. Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Denson v. State
775 So. 2d 288 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)