Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Hoffman

State v. Hoffman

664 P.2d 1154, 63 Or. App. 527, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3166
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 15, 1983
DocketM 166979; CA A25626
StatusPublished

This text of 664 P.2d 1154 (State v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hoffman, 664 P.2d 1154, 63 Or. App. 527, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3166 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this driving while suspended case, the trial court’s conclusion that the notice by mail provisions of ORS 482.570 are unconstitutional was incorrect.

Reversed and remanded for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 482.570
Oregon § 482.570

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 P.2d 1154, 63 Or. App. 527, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hoffman-orctapp-1983.