State v. Hoffman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hoffman

448 S.W.3d 873, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1313, 2014 WL 6682442

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2014·No. No. ED 100966·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darius R. Hoffman appeals the circuit court’s judgment, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of violating an order of protection, section 455.085, R.S.Mo. (2000), and resisting arrest, section 575.150, R.S.Mo. (2000). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have provided the parties with a brief written statement setting forth the reasons for our affirmance.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darius R. Hoffman appeals the circuit court’s judgment, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of violating an order of protection, section 455.085, R.S.Mo. (2000), and resisting arrest, section 575.150, R.S.Mo. (2000). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have provided the parties with a brief written statement setting forth the reasons for our affirmance.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hoffman, 448 S.W.3d 873, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1313, 2014 WL 6682442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

448 S.W.3d 873 (State v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.