State v. Hoffine
259 P. 697, 124 Kan. 344, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 241
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Appellant was found guilty of the possession of intoxicating liquor, in violation of the statute (R. S. 21-2101). The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The legal questions sought to be raised are trivial in the extreme. They have no merit. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hoffine, 259 P. 697, 124 Kan. 344, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 241 (kan 1927).
259 P. 697 (State v. Hoffine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.