Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Hoeper

State v. Hoeper

828 P.2d 1058, 112 Or. App. 640, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 774
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 22, 1992
Docket10-90-04655, 10-90-05780; CA A66249 (Control), A66250
StatusPublished

This text of 828 P.2d 1058 (State v. Hoeper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hoeper, 828 P.2d 1058, 112 Or. App. 640, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 774 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant, relying on State v. Wold, 105 Or App 158, 160-61, 803 P2d 782 (1991), seeks vacation of the 180-day jail term that he received as a condition of probation after he pled guilty to DUII.1 ORS 813.010. He contends that the sentence exceeds the maximum allowable by law. ORS 138.050; ORS 138.053. The sentence is proper. State v. Oary, 109 Or App 580, 583, 820 P2d 857 (1991), mod 112 Or App 296, 829 P2d 90 (1992).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wold
803 P.2d 782 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Oary
820 P.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Oary
829 P.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
828 P.2d 1058, 112 Or. App. 640, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hoeper-orctapp-1992.