State v. Hoeber

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hoeber

341 S.W.3d 195, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 669, 2011 WL 1842804

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 17, 2011·No. WD 72448·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Edward Hoeber appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, after a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress testimony concerning his self-incriminating statements.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Edward Hoeber appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, after a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress testimony concerning his self-incriminating statements.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hoeber, 341 S.W.3d 195, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 669, 2011 WL 1842804 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

341 S.W.3d 195 (State v. Hoeber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related