State v. Hodges

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Hodges

258 So. 2d 851, 261 La. 1, 1972 La. LEXIS 5900

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 8, 1972

DocketNo. 52021

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 258 So. 2d 851 (State v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hodges, 258 So. 2d 851, 261 La. 1, 1972 La. LEXIS 5900 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, James O. Hodges, appeals from a conviction of Possession of Heroin, [4]*4La.R.S. 40:962 as a second offender, La. R.S. 15:529.1, for which he was sentenced to fifteen years in the state penitentiary.

The defendant perfected no bills of exceptions. We are, therefore, limited on appeal to a review of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable error. La.C.Cr.P. art. 920; State v. Ash, 257 La. 337, 242 So.2d 535 (1971). We find none.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, James O. Hodges, appeals from a conviction of Possession of Heroin, [4]*4La.R.S. 40:962 as a second offender, La. R.S. 15:529.1, for which he was sentenced to fifteen years in the state penitentiary.

The defendant perfected no bills of exceptions. We are, therefore, limited on appeal to a review of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable error. La.C.Cr.P. art. 920; State v. Ash, 257 La. 337, 242 So.2d 535 (1971). We find none.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 So. 2d 851, 261 La. 1, 1972 La. LEXIS 5900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hodges-la-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack