State v. Hodge

297 S.W.3d 139, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1590, 2009 WL 3754007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hodge. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1618
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 10, 2009·No. ED 90973·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darris M. Hodge appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree trafficking in violation of Section 195.223 1 and possession of less than 35 grams of marijuana in violation of Section 195.202. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error, plain or otherwise. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hodge, 297 S.W.3d 139, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1590, 2009 WL 3754007 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

297 S.W.3d 139 (State v. Hodge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Shared Services, LLC
297 S.W.3d 139 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)