State v. Hockaday

201 P.3d 309, 165 Wash. 2d 1007
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 3, 2008
Docket82169-1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 201 P.3d 309 (State v. Hockaday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hockaday, 201 P.3d 309, 165 Wash. 2d 1007 (Wash. 2008).

Opinion

201 P.3d 309 (2008)
165 Wash.2d 1007

STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Adam J. HOCKADAY, Petitioner.

No. 82169-1.

Supreme Court of Washington.

December 3, 2008.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered this matter at its December 2, 2008, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review is granted. The Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of State v. Quismundo, 164 Wash.2d 499, 192 P.3d 342 (2008).

/s/Gerry L. Alexander CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hockaday
149 Wash. App. 521 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
Otis Housing Ass'n, Inc. v. Ha
201 P.3d 309 (Washington Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 P.3d 309, 165 Wash. 2d 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hockaday-wash-2008.