State v. Hoa Van Nguyen
734 A.2d 565, 248 Conn. 913, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 139
This text of 734 A.2d 565 (State v. Hoa Van Nguyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Hoa Van Nguyen, 734 A.2d 565, 248 Conn. 913, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 139 (Colo. 1999).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 85 (AC 17107), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that no evidentiary hearing was necessary regarding whether the defendant had violated the sequestration order?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the sequestration order had been violated?
“3. If the answer to either question one or question two is no, was the error of the trial court harmless?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Nguyen
756 A.2d 833 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
734 A.2d 565, 248 Conn. 913, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hoa-van-nguyen-conn-1999.