State v. Hoa Van Nguyen
734 A.2d 565, 248 Conn. 913, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 139
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 85 (AC 17107), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that no evidentiary hearing was necessary regarding whether the defendant had violated the sequestration order?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the sequestration order had been violated?
“3. If the answer to either question one or question two is no, was the error of the trial court harmless?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hoa Van Nguyen, 734 A.2d 565, 248 Conn. 913, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 139 (Colo. 1999).
734 A.2d 565 (State v. Hoa Van Nguyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Nguyen
756 A.2d 833 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)