State v. Hlavsa

736 N.E.2d 26, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1430, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2517
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 4, 2000
Docket00-1177
StatusPublished

This text of 736 N.E.2d 26 (State v. Hlavsa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hlavsa, 736 N.E.2d 26, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1430, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2517 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 76221. The discretionary appeal is allowed on Proposition of Law No. I; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 00-357 and 00-415, State v. Wells, Montgomery App. No. 17501; briefing schedule stayed.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
736 N.E.2d 26, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1430, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hlavsa-ohio-2000.