State v. Hirabayashi
246 P. 577, 139 Wash. 696, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 899
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hirabayashi. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Wash. 462 →
Opinions
On Rehearing.
The above cause having been reheard En Banc, the majority of the court still alhere to the result reached in the opinion of the Department as reported in 133 Wash. 462, 233 Pac. 948.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hirabayashi, 246 P. 577, 139 Wash. 696, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 899 (Wash. 1926).
246 P. 577 (State v. Hirabayashi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hirabayashi
233 P. 948 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)
State v. Kosai
234 P. 5 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)
Farrell v. Mentzer
174 P. 482 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)
Oregon Mortgage Co. v. Carstens
35 L.R.A. 841 (Washington Supreme Court, 1896)
Goon Gan v. Richardson
47 P. 762 (Washington Supreme Court, 1897)
Abrams v. State
88 P. 327 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)
State ex rel. Atkinson v. World Real Estate Commercial Co.
89 P. 471 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)
Adley v. Pletcher
104 P. 167 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Keene v. Zindorf
142 P. 484 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)
Prentice v. How
146 P. 388 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)