State v. Hinton

787 S.E.2d 35, 368 N.C. 928, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 568, 2016 WL 3434753
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 9, 2016·No. 449P11-13·Published

Opinion

1. Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

1. Dismissed

2. Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for Necessary Joinder of Parties

2. Dismissed

3. Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for Joinder of Claims and Remedies

3. Dismissed

4. Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for Evidentiary Oral Hearing and Findings and Conclusions by the Court

4. Dismissed

5. Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for Inquiry into Restraints on Liberty; Petition for Writ of Habeas Coitus; Relief from Judgments

5. Denied 02/19/2016

6. Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for Calendaring Cause

6. Dismissed

Ervin, J.,

recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hinton, 787 S.E.2d 35, 368 N.C. 928, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 568, 2016 WL 3434753 (N.C. 2016).

787 S.E.2d 35 (State v. Hinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.