State v. Hinson

700 S.E.2d 221

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 364 N.C. 414 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 8, 2010·No. 176A10·Published

Opinion

700 S.E.2d 221 (2010)

No. 176A10.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 8, 2010.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John P. Scherer II and Katherine A. Murphy, Assistant *222 Attorneys General, for the State-appellant.

Teddy & Meekins, by Anne Bleyman, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

700 S.E.2d 221 (2010)

No. 176A10.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 8, 2010.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John P. Scherer II and Katherine A. Murphy, Assistant *222 Attorneys General, for the State-appellant.

Teddy & Meekins, by Anne Bleyman, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

State v. Hinson, 700 S.E.2d 221 (N.C. 2010).

Pincite

700 S.E.2d 221 (State v. Hinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

700 S.E.2d 221 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)