State v. Hinojos
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. No. 32,234
5 EZEQUIEL HINOJOS,
6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY 8 Don Maddox, District Judge
9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM
11 for Appellee
12 Collopy Law Offices 13 Bryon Collopy 14 Hobbs, NM
15 for Appellant
16 MEMORANDUM OPINION
17 FRY, Judge.
18 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.
19 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing
20 so has expired. AFFIRMED. 1 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 3 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
4 WE CONCUR:
5 6 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
7 8 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hinojos (State v. Hinojos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.