State v. Hinkle

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hinkle

638 S.W.2d 804, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3654

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 24, 1982

DocketNo. 44449

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 638 S.W.2d 804 (State v. Hinkle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hinkle, 638 S.W.2d 804, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3654 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury for felonious restraint in violation of Section 565.120 RSMo 1978¹ and sentenced to one year in the St. Louis Medium Security Institution.

Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict since it did not establish exposure of [805]*805the victim to a substantial risk of serious physical injury. We disagree. In determining the sufficiency of the evidence, we accept as true evidence tending to support the jury’s finding and favorable inferences that can be reasonably drawn therefrom and disregard all contrary evidence and inferences. State v. Puckett, 611 S.W.2d 242, 244 (Mo.App.1980).

The victim was walking to her mother’s house when defendant and another man drove by in a white automobile. The defendant turned the car around and asked if she wanted a ride. She declined. One of the men got out of the car and told her that he knew she was tired and they would give her a ride home. Believing the men would not harm her, she accepted. Instead of taking the victim home, the defendant drove to near Arnold, Missouri. The men stated they would hurt her if she called the police and that she was lucky they were going to take her home because they normally did not take girls home.

The defendant got into the backseat and attempted to remove her clothes. He warned her that he would hurt her if she did not cooperate. She jerked away from the defendant. He wrapped his arm around the victim’s neck, bit her and proceeded to rape her. The defendant released the victim by the highway and threatened to come after her if she called the police.

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and establish a substantial risk of serious physical harm. People v. Szymczak, 60 A.D.2d 663, 400 N.Y.S.2d 199 (N.Y.App.Div.1977). The judgment is affirmed.

GUNN, C. J., and SIMON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury for felonious restraint in violation of Section 565.120 RSMo 1978¹ and sentenced to one year in the St. Louis Medium Security Institution.

Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict since it did not establish exposure of [805]*805the victim to a substantial risk of serious physical injury. We disagree. In determining the sufficiency of the evidence, we accept as true evidence tending to support the jury’s finding and favorable inferences that can be reasonably drawn therefrom and disregard all contrary evidence and inferences. State v. Puckett, 611 S.W.2d 242, 244 (Mo.App.1980).

The victim was walking to her mother’s house when defendant and another man drove by in a white automobile. The defendant turned the car around and asked if she wanted a ride. She declined. One of the men got out of the car and told her that he knew she was tired and they would give her a ride home. Believing the men would not harm her, she accepted. Instead of taking the victim home, the defendant drove to near Arnold, Missouri. The men stated they would hurt her if she called the police and that she was lucky they were going to take her home because they normally did not take girls home.

The defendant got into the backseat and attempted to remove her clothes. He warned her that he would hurt her if she did not cooperate. She jerked away from the defendant. He wrapped his arm around the victim’s neck, bit her and proceeded to rape her. The defendant released the victim by the highway and threatened to come after her if she called the police.

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and establish a substantial risk of serious physical harm. People v. Szymczak, 60 A.D.2d 663, 400 N.Y.S.2d 199 (N.Y.App.Div.1977). The judgment is affirmed.

GUNN, C. J., and SIMON, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

638 S.W.2d 804, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hinkle-moctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack