State v. Hines
This text of 2022 Ohio 684 (State v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Hines, 2022-Ohio-684.]
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
STATE OF OHIO, :
Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110159 v. :
ANTWON M. HINES, :
Defendant-Appellant. :
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 10, 2022
Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-20-650683-A
Appearances:
Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sarah J. Denney, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Robert B. McCaleb, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
LISA B. FORBES, J.:
I. Facts and Procedural History
On October 7, 2020, Antwon M. Hines (“Hines”) pled guilty to
attempted aggravated robbery, a second-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2923.02 and 2911.01(A)(1), with a one-year firearm specification. On November 18, 2020,
the court sentenced Hines to two-to-three years in prison for the attempted
aggravated robbery under the Reagan Tokes Law and one year in prison for the
firearm specification to run consecutively.
It is from this sentence that Hines appeals, arguing that the Reagan
Tokes Law is unconstitutional because it violates the right to trial by jury, the
separation-of-powers doctrine, and the right to due process.
II. Law and Analysis
Hines’s assignment of error is overruled pursuant to this court’s en
banc decision in State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470.
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the
common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27
of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
LISA B. FORBES, JUDGE
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, A.J., and EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
N.B. The author of this opinion is constrained to apply Delvallie. For a full explanation, see State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470 (Forbes, J., dissenting).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 Ohio 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hines-ohioctapp-2022.