State v. Hines
82 S.E.2d 118, 240 N.C. 337, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 434
Opinion
This case involves no new question requiring extended discussion. A careful examination of the record leaves us with the impression it is free of prejudicial error. See S. v. Rainey, 236 N.C. 738, 741, 74 S.E. 2d 39, 41; S. v. Honeycutt, 237 N.C. 595, 599, 75 S.E. 2d 525, 527. The verdict and judgments will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hines, 82 S.E.2d 118, 240 N.C. 337, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 434 (N.C. 1954).
82 S.E.2d 118 (State v. Hines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Rainey
74 S.E.2d 39 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Honeycutt
75 S.E.2d 525 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)