State v. Himel
This text of 246 So. 2d 858 (State v. Himel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: Thorn B. Himel and Cyril Geary applying for writs of certiorari and review.
The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,
It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Hdnorable Elmo Lear, Judge of the 19th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, oil or before the 8th day of October, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.
It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through his attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 So. 2d 858, 258 La. 546, 1971 La. LEXIS 4333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-himel-la-1971.