State v. Hills

892 S.W.2d 821, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 294, 1995 WL 73368
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 1995·No. No. 64206·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Samuel Hills, appeals from a jury trial conviction of the class B felony of delivery of a controlled substance, RSMo § 195.211 (Cum.Supp.1990), entered by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis and for which appellant was sentenced as a class X offender to twelve years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Appellant also appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hills, 892 S.W.2d 821, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 294, 1995 WL 73368 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

892 S.W.2d 821 (State v. Hills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterson v. Peterson
595 S.W.2d 889 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)