State v. Hillman

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Hillman

160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 293

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 9, 1953·No. No. 33365·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The journalization of the order of the trial court overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial before the journalization of the judgment of sentence was a nullity. State v. Nickles, 159 Ohio St., 353, 112 N. E. (2d), 531.

Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals [295]*295affirming the order of the trial court overruling the motion to vacate was erroneous, and it is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings according to law.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taft, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Lamneck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The journalization of the order of the trial court overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial before the journalization of the judgment of sentence was a nullity. State v. Nickles, 159 Ohio St., 353, 112 N. E. (2d), 531.

Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals [295]*295affirming the order of the trial court overruling the motion to vacate was erroneous, and it is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings according to law.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taft, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Lamneck, JJ., concur.

State v. Hillman, 160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 293 (Ohio 1953).

Pincite

160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 293 (State v. Hillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.