Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. Hilliard

State v. Hilliard

350 S.W.3d 488, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2011 WL 4916329
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 18, 2011
DocketWD 72347
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 350 S.W.3d 488 (State v. Hilliard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hilliard, 350 S.W.3d 488, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2011 WL 4916329 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Gary Hilliard appeals his conviction in the Cass County Circuit Court of assault in the second degree. Hilliard contends that the trial court erred in submitting the verdict director for assault in the second degree, because there was insufficient evidence presented at trial that he acted recklessly. He further contends that the court erred in entering judgment against him on the jury’s guilty verdict for assault in the second degree, because there was insufficient evidence presented for such a conviction. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taft v. State
350 S.W.3d 488 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
350 S.W.3d 488, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2011 WL 4916329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hilliard-moctapp-2011.