State v. Hilliard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hilliard

350 S.W.3d 488, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2011 WL 4916329

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 2011·No. WD 72347·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Gary Hilliard appeals his conviction in the Cass County Circuit Court of assault in the second degree. Hilliard contends that the trial court erred in submitting the verdict director for assault in the second degree, because there was insufficient evidence presented at trial that he acted recklessly. He further contends that the court erred in entering judgment against him on the jury’s guilty verdict for assault in the second degree, because there was insufficient evidence presented for such a conviction. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Gary Hilliard appeals his conviction in the Cass County Circuit Court of assault in the second degree. Hilliard contends that the trial court erred in submitting the verdict director for assault in the second degree, because there was insufficient evidence presented at trial that he acted recklessly. He further contends that the court erred in entering judgment against him on the jury’s guilty verdict for assault in the second degree, because there was insufficient evidence presented for such a conviction. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hilliard, 350 S.W.3d 488, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2011 WL 4916329 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

350 S.W.3d 488 (State v. Hilliard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related