State v. Hilliard

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Hilliard

11 So. 2d 487, 152 Fla. 294, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 895

DecidedJanuary 22, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 11 So. 2d 487 (State v. Hilliard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hilliard, 11 So. 2d 487, 152 Fla. 294, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 895 (Fla. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

CHAPMAN, J.:

Two questions for consideration and determination have been certified to this Court under Supreme Court Rule No. 38 by the Circuit Court of Dixie County, Florida, in the above stated cause,-on the theory that no existing precedent was applicable thereto at the time the certification order was made *295 and entered. Since the order was entered in the lower court herein practically the same question was presented, briefed and ably argued at the bar of this Court, and the same carefully considered by this Court in the case of General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. State of Florida, in which an opinion and judgment have this day been entered. Question No. 1 propounded is fully answered therein. Answer to Question No. 2 is rendered unnecessary by our holding in General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. State of Florida.

Further proceedings will be had in the lower court in the case at bar not inconsistent with our ruling and holding in General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. State of Florida, supra.

It is so ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur. SEBRING, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPMAN, J.:

Two questions for consideration and determination have been certified to this Court under Supreme Court Rule No. 38 by the Circuit Court of Dixie County, Florida, in the above stated cause,-on the theory that no existing precedent was applicable thereto at the time the certification order was made *295 and entered. Since the order was entered in the lower court herein practically the same question was presented, briefed and ably argued at the bar of this Court, and the same carefully considered by this Court in the case of General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. State of Florida, in which an opinion and judgment have this day been entered. Question No. 1 propounded is fully answered therein. Answer to Question No. 2 is rendered unnecessary by our holding in General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. State of Florida.

Further proceedings will be had in the lower court in the case at bar not inconsistent with our ruling and holding in General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. State of Florida, supra.

It is so ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur. SEBRING, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 So. 2d 487, 152 Fla. 294, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hilliard-fla-1943.