State v. Hill

Texas Supreme Court

State v. Hill

35 Tex. 348

DecidedJuly 1, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Tex. 348 (State v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hill, 35 Tex. 348 (Tex. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Ogden, J.

The indictment in this case charged that the defendant, on or about the eighteenth day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy, an assault did make, etc. We think the time of the commission of the offense is charged as specifically and as definitely as the statute requires.

This question was carefully considered and definitely settled at the last term of this court, in the case of The State v. Elliott. The court therefore erred in sustaining-the motion to quash, for that reason. The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogden, J.

The indictment in this case charged that the defendant, on or about the eighteenth day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy, an assault did make, etc. We think the time of the commission of the offense is charged as specifically and as definitely as the statute requires.

This question was carefully considered and definitely settled at the last term of this court, in the case of The State v. Elliott. The court therefore erred in sustaining-the motion to quash, for that reason. The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Tex. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hill-tex-1872.