State v. Hill

5 S.C.L. 89
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 3, 1812·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Geimke, J.,

of the same opinion, except in extraordinary cases, where there is a contagious distemper in the prison, &c.

Brevaed, Nott, and Colcock, Js.,

were of opinion the court ought to exercise a discretion in considering and deciding on affidavits produced, although they may tend to controvert the finding of the jury : but Nott, and Colcock, Js., were of opinion that the judge had done so in this case. He refused to héar the affidavits read.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hill, 5 S.C.L. 89 (S.C. 1812).

5 S.C.L. 89 (State v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hill
444 S.E.2d 255 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1994)