State v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Hill

674 P.2d 64, 66 Or. App. 350, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2504

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 4, 1984

Docket82-397-C; CA A27496

StatusPublished

This text of 674 P.2d 64 (State v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hill, 674 P.2d 64, 66 Or. App. 350, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2504 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state asks us to determine whether a bench warrant, issued other than on a supporting affidavit or sworn statement showing probable cause, will support an arrest and a search incident to arrest. In a search of defendant, incident to his arrest on a district court bench warrant, contraband was found. The circuit court granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of the contraband on the ground that the bench warrant had issued without a showing of probable cause.

Because the district court file has not been made a part of the record on appeal, we do not know what the district court judge had before him and are unable to determine whether the bench warrant was properly issued and, therefore, are unable to review the state’s claim of error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The state asks us to determine whether a bench warrant, issued other than on a supporting affidavit or sworn statement showing probable cause, will support an arrest and a search incident to arrest. In a search of defendant, incident to his arrest on a district court bench warrant, contraband was found. The circuit court granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of the contraband on the ground that the bench warrant had issued without a showing of probable cause.

Because the district court file has not been made a part of the record on appeal, we do not know what the district court judge had before him and are unable to determine whether the bench warrant was properly issued and, therefore, are unable to review the state’s claim of error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

674 P.2d 64, 66 Or. App. 350, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hill-orctapp-1984.