State v. Hill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Hill

642 A.2d 1002, 136 N.J. 292

DecidedApril 8, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 642 A.2d 1002 (State v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hill, 642 A.2d 1002, 136 N.J. 292 (N.J. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on defendant’s appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-l(a)(2), and good cause appearing.

ORDERED that the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Oaklyn Municipal Court, Camden County, for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s decision in State v. Gookins, 135 N.J. 42, 637 A.2d 1255 (1994).

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on defendant’s appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-l(a)(2), and good cause appearing.

ORDERED that the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Oaklyn Municipal Court, Camden County, for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s decision in State v. Gookins, 135 N.J. 42, 637 A.2d 1255 (1994).

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

642 A.2d 1002, 136 N.J. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hill-nj-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack