State v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Hill

170 S.E.2d 103, 6 N.C. App. 446, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1209

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 22, 1969

DocketNo. 6910SC487

StatusPublished

This text of 170 S.E.2d 103 (State v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hill, 170 S.E.2d 103, 6 N.C. App. 446, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1209 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Vaughn, J.

The only assignment of error in this appeal is that the judgment revoking the suspended sentence was in error because it was based solely upon a conviction for a subsequent assault which conviction the defendant contends was erroneous.

By opinion filed this day in the assault case, we have affirmed the conviction which the defendant contended was erroneous. The judgment putting into effect the suspended sentence is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Beocic and Beitt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vaughn, J.

The only assignment of error in this appeal is that the judgment revoking the suspended sentence was in error because it was based solely upon a conviction for a subsequent assault which conviction the defendant contends was erroneous.

By opinion filed this day in the assault case, we have affirmed the conviction which the defendant contended was erroneous. The judgment putting into effect the suspended sentence is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Beocic and Beitt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 S.E.2d 103, 6 N.C. App. 446, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hill-ncctapp-1969.