State v. Hill
202 S.W.3d 98, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1469, 2006 WL 2807802
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 279 →
Opinion
ORDER
Arlando Hill appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of tampering in the first degree and resisting a lawful stop. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hill, 202 S.W.3d 98, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1469, 2006 WL 2807802 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
202 S.W.3d 98 (State v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.