State v. Hill

176 So. 719, 179 Miss. 732, 1937 Miss. LEXIS 76
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 1, 1937
DocketNo. 32889.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 176 So. 719 (State v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hill, 176 So. 719, 179 Miss. 732, 1937 Miss. LEXIS 76 (Mich. 1937).

Opinion

Anderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee was indicted in the circuit court of Hinds *735 county of the crime denounced by section 1170, Code of 1930, commonly known as sodomy. That statute is in this language: “Unnatural intercourse. — Every person who shall be convicted of the detestable and abominable crime against nature committed with mankind or with a beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of mot more than ten years.”

The indictment was demurred to by appellee, the demurrer was sustained, and the state granted an appeal under the authority of paragraph (1), section 19 of the Code, which provides that the state shall have the right to appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to, or a motion to quash, an indictment.

That part of the indictment describing the ofíense is in this language: “Did then and there wilfully and unlawfully and feloniously commit the detestable and abominable crime against nature by having unnatural carnal intercourse with Fannie Walker, a female human by sucking her private sexual organs with his mouth, he the said J. D. Hill being a male person.”

We are of the opinion that the judgment of the circuit court is correct. Penetration of the body is essential to the offense. Yol. 1, Wharton’s Criminal Law (10 Ed.), section 579, and authorities in the notes.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. State
636 So. 2d 391 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1994)
State v. Barrett
293 S.E.2d 896 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
State v. Ludlum
281 S.E.2d 159 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1981)
Harold Locke v. Jimmy H. Rose, Warden
514 F.2d 570 (Sixth Circuit, 1975)
Harris v. State
457 P.2d 638 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1969)
State v. Whittemore
122 S.E.2d 396 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 So. 719, 179 Miss. 732, 1937 Miss. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hill-miss-1937.