State v. Hill

1 Houston 420
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedApril 5, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Houston 420 (State v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hill, 1 Houston 420 (Del. Ct. App. 1874).

Opinion

Joseph Hill was indicted and tried for stealing one local passenger ticket of the value of two dollars and seventy-five cents, of the goods and chattels of the Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Company. It had been stolen from the ticket office and from the custody of the ticket agent of the company at Harrington, and had not been stamped and dated by him, or used, or disposed of by the prisoner on the road or otherwise. held otherwise, and Chief Justice Gilpin remarked that the rule at common law is that larceny can only be committed of personal property, or goods and chattels which have some intrinsic value, or a value in itself without reference to any other matter or thing. The intrinsic value of such a piece of printed pasteboard merely is not even appreciable in any coin we have, and as we have no statutory provision making such an article as this railroad ticket a subject of larceny, we do not think the indictment can be sustained, and we must therefore direct the jury to acquit the prisoner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McClellan
73 A. 993 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1909)
State v. Spencer
45 A. 399 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Houston 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hill-delsuperct-1874.