State v. Highsmith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Highsmith

87 S.E. 482, 103 S.C. 168, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 1

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 10, 1916

Docket9254

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 482 (State v. Highsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Highsmith, 87 S.E. 482, 103 S.C. 168, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 1 (S.C. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion is by defendant, Highsmith, to suspend the operation of Judge Shipp’s order until the appeal by Highsmith from Judge Mauldin’s order shall have been heard and decided.

We think the motion must be granted, but only upon’ execution of a bond for $200, with surety to be approved by the clerk of Court for Sumter, conditioned ,to pay so much as the plaintiff, Thompson, may recover in his action against Highsmith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion is by defendant, Highsmith, to suspend the operation of Judge Shipp’s order until the appeal by Highsmith from Judge Mauldin’s order shall have been heard and decided.

We think the motion must be granted, but only upon’ execution of a bond for $200, with surety to be approved by the clerk of Court for Sumter, conditioned ,to pay so much as the plaintiff, Thompson, may recover in his action against Highsmith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 S.E. 482, 103 S.C. 168, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-highsmith-sc-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack