State v. Highsmith

126 So. 3d 1188, 2012 WL 4795650, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17442
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 2012·No. No. 4D11-2451·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Knipp v. State, 67 So.3d 376, 379-80 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); see also Wagner v. State, 88 So.3d 250, 253 (Fla. [1189]*11894th DCA 2012); Gonzalez v. State, 84 So.3d 362, 363 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

WARNER, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Highsmith, 126 So. 3d 1188, 2012 WL 4795650, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17442 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

126 So. 3d 1188 (State v. Highsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knipp v. State
67 So. 3d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Gonzalez v. State
84 So. 3d 362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Wagner v. State
88 So. 3d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)