State v. Higgins
This text of 364 S.W.3d 668 (State v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*669 ORDER
David Higgins appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of stealing over $500.00. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in denying Higgins’ motion for a mistrial, in questioning him about his prior felony convictions, nor in finding him to be a persistent offender. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
364 S.W.3d 668, 2012 WL 453662, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-higgins-moctapp-2012.