State v. Higginbotham
643 P.2d 878, 56 Or. App. 861, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2894
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 19, 1982·No. Nos. J80-2345 and J81-1596, CA A22007, A22008·Published
Opinion
In this consolidated appeal of two criminal convictions, the state concedes error in that the trial court gave no reason for the sentences which it imposed and failed to give any reason for making the sentences consecutive. See ORS 137.120(2); State v. Biles, 287 Or 63, 597 P2d 808 (1979). No other error is assigned.
Sentences vacated and causes remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Higginbotham, 643 P.2d 878, 56 Or. App. 861, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2894 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
643 P.2d 878 (State v. Higginbotham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Biles
597 P.2d 808 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)