State v. Higginbotham
643 P.2d 878, 56 Or. App. 861, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2894
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 19, 1982
DocketNos. J80-2345 and J81-1596, CA A22007, A22008
StatusPublished
This text of 643 P.2d 878 (State v. Higginbotham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Higginbotham, 643 P.2d 878, 56 Or. App. 861, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2894 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
Opinion
In this consolidated appeal of two criminal convictions, the state concedes error in that the trial court gave no reason for the sentences which it imposed and failed to give any reason for making the sentences consecutive. See ORS 137.120(2); State v. Biles, 287 Or 63, 597 P2d 808 (1979). No other error is assigned.
Sentences vacated and causes remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Biles
597 P.2d 808 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
643 P.2d 878, 56 Or. App. 861, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-higginbotham-orctapp-1982.