State v. Higens

Supreme Court of Iowa

State v. Higens

47 N.W. 779, 82 Iowa 715

DecidedJanuary 21, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 47 N.W. 779 (State v. Higens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Higens, 47 N.W. 779, 82 Iowa 715 (iowa 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Given, J.

The defendant was indicted, - tried and convicted on two indictments for the crime of embezzlement. His motions for a new trial in each case being overruled, judgment was pronounced from which he appealed, notice whereof was duly served, November 7, 1889. The appellant having failed to prosecute his appeal, attorneys for appellee have filed a transcript of the indictments, judgments and notices of appeal, and ask affirmance of said judgment. We do not discover any errors in the record before us, and the judgments of the district court in said causes are, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Given, J.

The defendant was indicted, - tried and convicted on two indictments for the crime of embezzlement. His motions for a new trial in each case being overruled, judgment was pronounced from which he appealed, notice whereof was duly served, November 7, 1889. The appellant having failed to prosecute his appeal, attorneys for appellee have filed a transcript of the indictments, judgments and notices of appeal, and ask affirmance of said judgment. We do not discover any errors in the record before us, and the judgments of the district court in said causes are, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 N.W. 779, 82 Iowa 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-higens-iowa-1891.