State v. Hicks
567 P.2d 624, 30 Or. App. 773, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1710
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 22, 1977·No. No. C 75-10-3119 Cr, (DA 114411), CA 7585·Published
Opinion
The trial court properly denied appellant’s motion to suppress, Chambers v. Moroney, 399 US 42, 26 L Ed 2d 419, 90 S Ct 1975 (1970), and State v. Pennington, 28 Or App 331, 559 P2d 915, Sup Ct review denied (1977), and for a new trial, State v. Hancock, 247 Or 21, 426 P2d 872 (1967), and State v. Arndt, 1 Or App 608, 465 P2d 486 (1970).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hicks, 567 P.2d 624, 30 Or. App. 773, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1710 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).
567 P.2d 624 (State v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chambers v. Maroney
399 U.S. 42 (Supreme Court, 1970)
State v. Arndt
465 P.2d 486 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1970)
State v. Hancock
426 P.2d 872 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Pennington
559 P.2d 915 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)