State v. Hicks
175 S.E.2d 365, 9 N.C. App. 61, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1282
Opinion
[62] Counsel for this indigent defendant has not filed a brief in support of his appeal. In the record on appeal counsel includes a statement that he can find no error and asks that this Court review the record on appeal to determine whether errors appear therein. We have considered the appeal as an exception to the judgment and reviewed the record proper. State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330. No prejudicial error appears therein.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hicks, 175 S.E.2d 365, 9 N.C. App. 61, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1282 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).
175 S.E.2d 365 (State v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Elliott
153 S.E.2d 330 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)