State v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Hicks

175 S.E.2d 365, 9 N.C. App. 61, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1282

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 15, 1970

DocketNo. 7024SC359

StatusPublished

This text of 175 S.E.2d 365 (State v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hicks, 175 S.E.2d 365, 9 N.C. App. 61, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1282 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Vaughn, J.

[62]*62Counsel for this indigent defendant has not filed a brief in support of his appeal. In the record on appeal counsel includes a statement that he can find no error and asks that this Court review the record on appeal to determine whether errors appear therein. We have considered the appeal as an exception to the judgment and reviewed the record proper. State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330. No prejudicial error appears therein.

Affirmed.

Campbell and Parker, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vaughn, J.

[62]*62Counsel for this indigent defendant has not filed a brief in support of his appeal. In the record on appeal counsel includes a statement that he can find no error and asks that this Court review the record on appeal to determine whether errors appear therein. We have considered the appeal as an exception to the judgment and reviewed the record proper. State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330. No prejudicial error appears therein.

Affirmed.

Campbell and Parker, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 S.E.2d 365, 9 N.C. App. 61, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hicks-ncctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack