State v. Hicks

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Hicks

558 So. 2d 59, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 1990 WL 15907

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1990

DocketNo. 88-02926

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 558 So. 2d 59 (State v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hicks, 558 So. 2d 59, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 1990 WL 15907 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order dismissing an information charging Ms. Hicks with keeping a house of ill fame in violation of section 796.01, Florida Statutes (1987). In this case, the state intended to prove that Ms. Hicks operated the Mons Venus, a nude dancing establishment located in Tampa, Florida.

The trial court dismissed the information on the ground that section 796.01, Florida Statutes (1987), is unconstitutionally vague. The trial court’s ruling is essentially identical to the order which we reversed in State v. Warren, 558 So.2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We reverse this order of dismissal on the same grounds, for the same reasons, and with the same reservations as stated in Warren.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI