State v. Hicks

558 So. 2d 59, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 1990 WL 15907
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 1990·No. No. 88-02926·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order dismissing an information charging Ms. Hicks with keeping a house of ill fame in violation of section 796.01, Florida Statutes (1987). In this case, the state intended to prove that Ms. Hicks operated the Mons Venus, a nude dancing establishment located in Tampa, Florida.

The trial court dismissed the information on the ground that section 796.01, Florida Statutes (1987), is unconstitutionally vague. The trial court’s ruling is essentially identical to the order which we reversed in State v. Warren, 558 So.2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We reverse this order of dismissal on the same grounds, for the same reasons, and with the same reservations as stated in Warren.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hicks, 558 So. 2d 59, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 1990 WL 15907 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 59 (State v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hicks v. State
572 So. 2d 1378 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Durham v. Palm Court, Inc.
558 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)